November 4, 2009
I think we’d all agree that some ways of learning are better than others. I’d much rather learn from someone that uses visuals and can tell a good story to keep me engaged. I know, that’s obvious, but have you thought about the affects and benefits of spacing out your training versus doing it all at once? Most often the timing question is driven by urgency and people’s availability (convenience) rather than what will be most effective. The challenge we face here is that there is a direct cost incurred by organizations when they train so logically it make sense to find the most cost effective way to carry out the training. The part that is over looked is that there is incremental benefit of more effective training which isn’t always easy to calculate. It comes down to this question that I pose to my clients every time they are looking at making improvements to their training programs.
Read the full article →
November 2, 2009
We all are aware of the reality that the internet makes the world smaller, increases competition & drives prices down. At the surface level, a logical conclusion could be that it will be harder and harder to compete. The reality is that the amount of choices we all have does not make it harder to compete, it makes it harder to make a decision to buy!
What does that mean to me?
The need for true content experts & consultants (meaning sales people that use a consultative sales process) is on the rise. Consumers that are faced with too many choices tend to not make any decision at all.
Do your research, offer three options, and recommend your top choice. You’ll be surprised at the results.
ScienceDaily (Mar. 12, 2009) — It is a common belief that having more options is better, and that people tend to go to stores that provide them with more choices. However, a new study in the journal Psychology & Marketing reveals that when people cannot easily determine which option is preferable, they are more likely to leave the store empty-handed. When options are very similar or the options are difficult to compare, people are likely to leave the store without making a choice. If there isn’t enough time to acquire the necessary information for making a choice, then the individual may leave without choosing anything.
Researcher Beth Veinott, Ph.D., and colleagues performed the first simulation of the choice overload effect in which people sometimes prefer a choice among fewer options than more options. The study provides explanations for why the behavioral experiments of this effect have received mixed results.
“With the rise of the internet, the number of choices that people have is only increasing,” the authors conclude. “Our research suggests that there may be a downside to this increase of options affecting people’s ability to decide in a particular situation.”
Various facets of what has been characterized as the “tyranny of choice” are explored in other articles featured in the March issue of Psychology & Marketing, a special issue devoted to research on consumer behavior as it relates to purchase intent and purchase choice.
Journal reference:
1. Jessup et al. Leaving the store empty-handed: Testing explanations for the too-much-choice effect using decision field theory. Psychology and Marketing, 2009; 26 (3): 299 DOI: 10.1002/mar.20274
Wiley-Blackwell (2009, March 12). Consumers Stop Buying As Number Of Options Increase. ScienceDaily. Retrieved November 2, 2009, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090311111008.htm#
Read the full article →
Rene F. Rodriguez
